data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d47db/d47db038b2d61e7ba9107f6757029175ed2b547b" alt="bb"
Two days ago, we removed the Google Buzz button from the top and bottom of each post on TechCrunch. No one noticed. Not a single person said a word about it. It wasn't until earlier today when
I tweeted�about it that we got some feedback on the change (most of it being: "oh, I didn't even notice"). As I tweeted, that in and of itself says a lot. The issue of Buzz being a viable sharing platform used to be somewhat of a hot-button issue. When I wrote
a post last March noting that traffic coming our way from Buzz appeared to be less than that of a dead man, FriendFeed, many folks got up in arms. It turns out,
my data was flawed ? but it wasn't necessarily wrong. You see, since Buzz runs within Gmail, which defaults to HTTPS, it scrubs the referrer data before sending the traffic our way. So,�conveniently, the only way to measure Buzz traffic was to infer it. Like a black hole.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b623/9b6238e8d94747e9d8229fdb3223bd03630ca327" alt=""
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/3JhLpMf4K9w/
LAND SOFTWARE LAM RESEARCH
No comments:
Post a Comment